[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Accepted articles :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Indexing::
Open Access Policy::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 11, Issue 1 (12-2023) ::
jehe 2023, 11(1): 89-103 Back to browse issues page
Health and safety assessment of the working environment in oil and gas terminals in Iran
Yahya Khosravi , Narmin Hassanzadeh-Rangi * , Mohammd-Reza Hassanbeigi
Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Health, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran-Research Center for Health, Safety and Environment, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, iran
Abstract:   (125 Views)
Background: Oil and gas terminals are considered key facilities in every country. The present study aimed to provide a combined model to assess the health and safety of the oil and gas working environment and other similar industries and services.
Methods: In this qualitative study, data were collected and produced by the methods of field survey, document review, individual interview, focus group interview and focus group discussion. A combination model of techniques including task analysis, effect, and failure mode analysis, event tree analysis, fault tree analysis, and fishbone diagram, was introduced and used to evaluate the health and safety of the work environment.
Results: Oil and gas terminal jobs have both many tasks and hazards. Among the studied jobs, liquid gas loaders (RPN1=158), general mechanics (RPN1=156), and lab technicians (RPN1=158) had the highest levels of risk that were over upper control while oil material masters had the lowest level of risk that was under lower control. Other jobs were under control.
Conclusion: Applying the corrective and preventive suggestions presented in the cause-control fishbone diagram and safe work procedures for each job, the risk level of the studied workplace can be reduced below the control limit and the negligible risk range. Other industries and services can use the combined model in workplace risk management.
Keywords: Risk assessment, Health, Safety, Environment, Oil terminal
Full-Text [PDF 967 kb]   (30 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2023/09/17 | Accepted: 2023/12/12 | Published: 2024/04/17
References
1. 1. Ahmadi O, Mortazavi SB, Mahabadi HA. Review of atmospheric storage tank fire scenarios: Costs and causes. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 2020;20: 384-405. [DOI:10.1007/s11668-020-00846-5]
2. Jiang D, Pan X-H, Hua M, et al. Assessment of tanks vulnerability and domino effect analysis in chemical storage plants. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2019;60: 174-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2019.04.016]
3. Chang JI, Lin C-C. A study of storage tank accidents. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 2006;19(1): 51-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2005.05.015]
4. Yang R, Gai K, Yang F, et al., editors. Simulation analysis of propylene storage tank leakage based on ALOHA software. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; 2019: IOP Publishing. [DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/267/4/042038]
5. Guo X, Ji J, Khan F, et al. Fuzzy Bayesian network based on an improved similarity aggregation method for risk assessment of storage tank accident. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2021;149: 817-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.03.017 [DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2021.03.047]
6. Halloul Y, Chiban S, Awad A. Adapted fuzzy fault tree analysis for oil storage tank fire. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 2019;41(8): 948-58. [DOI:10.1080/15567036.2018.1522393]
7. Sarvestani K, Ahmadi O, Mortazavi SB, Mahabadi HA. Development of a predictive accident model for dynamic risk assessment of propane storage tanks. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2021;148: 1217-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2021.02.018]
8. Pouyakian M, Jafari MJ, Laal F, et al. A comprehensive approach to analyze the risk of floating roof storage tanks. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2021;146: 811-36. [DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2020.11.051]
9. Sarvestani K, Ahmadi O, Alenjareghi MJ. LPG Storage Tank Accidents: Initiating Events, Causes, Scenarios, and Consequences. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 2021;21(4): 1305-14. [DOI:10.1007/s11668-021-01174-y]
10. Virdi PS, Pamnani G. Human error identification and risk prioritization in LPG unloading operations. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics 2023;29(1): 392-406. [DOI:10.1080/10803548.2022.2065771] [PMID]
11. Mohsin M, Zhan-ao W, Shijun Z, et al. Risk prioritization and management in gas stations by using fuzzy AHP and IPA analysis. 2021.
12. Reason J. Human error: models and management. Bmj 2000;320(7237): 768-70. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768] [PMID] []
13. Huang W, Shuai B, Zuo B, et al. A systematic railway dangerous goods transportation system risk analysis approach: The 24 model. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2019;61: 94-103. [DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2019.05.021]
14. Argyropoulos C, Christolis M, Nivolianitou Z, Markatos N. A hazards assessment methodology for large liquid hydrocarbon fuel tanks. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2012;25(2): 329-35. [DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2011.12.003]
15. Jafari M, Kouhi F, Movahedi M, Allah-Yari T. The effect of job safety analysis on risk perception of workers at high risk jobs in a refinery. Iran Occupational Health 2010;6(4): 15-28.
16. Yosefi M, Farshad A, Arghami S. Hazard analysis of seismic operation jobs through JSA Iran Occupational Health 2006;3(4): 39-45 (Persian).
17. Ikwan F, Sanders D, Hassan M. Safety evaluation of leak in a storage tank using fault tree analysis and risk matrix analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2021;73: 104597. [DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104597]
18. Fofana F, Bazeley P, Regnault A. Applying a mixed methods design to test saturation for qualitative data in health outcomes research. PloS one 2020;15(6): e0234898. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0234898] [PMID] []
19. Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine 2022;292: 114523. [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523] [PMID]
20. Humble N, Mozelius P, editors. Content analysis or thematic analysis: Similarities, differences and applications in qualitative research. European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies; 2022. [DOI:10.34190/ecrm.21.1.316]
21. Ericson CA. Hazard analysis techniques for system safety: John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
22. Khanzode VV, Maiti J, Ray P. A methodology for evaluation and monitoring of recurring hazards in underground coal mining. Safety Science 2011;49(8-9): 1172-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.03.009]
23. Connelly LM. Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg nursing 2016;25(6): 435.
24. Sainani KL. Reliability statistics. PM&R 2017;9(6): 622-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.05.001] [PMID]
25. Tixier J, Dusserre G, Salvi O, Gaston D. Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants. Journal of Loss Prevention in the process industries 2002;15(4): 291-303. [DOI:10.1016/S0950-4230(02)00008-6]
26. Khosravi Y, Asilian Mahabadi H, Hajizadeh E, et al. Why construction workers involve in unsafe behaviors? Part A: A qualitative research. Iran Occupational Health 2014;11(1): 55-69 (Persian).
27. Sharma RK, Kumar D, Kumar P. Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 2005;22(9): 986-1004. [DOI:10.1108/02656710510625248]
28. Manuele FA. Risk assessment & hierarchies of control. Professional Safety 2005;50(5): 33.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khosravi Y, Hassanzadeh-Rangi N, Hassanbeigi M. Health and safety assessment of the working environment in oil and gas terminals in Iran. jehe 2023; 11 (1) :89-103
URL: http://jehe.abzums.ac.ir/article-1-999-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 1 (12-2023) Back to browse issues page
مجله مهندسی بهداشت محیط Journal of Environmental Health Enginering
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645