Volume 11, Issue 3 (5-2024)
J Environ Health Eng 2024, 11(3): 302-314 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Fattahi N, Sharfi K, Moradi M. The survey of Ultrasound/Ferrate Process efficiency towards Beta-Estradiol 17 (E2) Oxidation in Aqueous Solutions: Investigating Chloroform Formation as a Disinfection Byproduct. J Environ Health Eng 2024; 11 (3) :302-314
URL: http://jehe.abzums.ac.ir/article-1-1046-en.html
URL: http://jehe.abzums.ac.ir/article-1-1046-en.html
Research Center for Environmental determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract: (620 Views)
Background: Hormones are chemical substances that can disrupt the processes and functions of the endocrine system in both humans and animals. The objective of this study is to examine the degradation of beta-estradiol 17 (E2) hormone through the ultrasound/ferrate process in aqueous solutions and the possibility of chloroform formation as a disinfection byproduct.
Methods: The experiments were conducted using a 250 mL glass container. An ultrasound device operating at frequencies between 24 kHz and 80 kHz, with a maximum power of 200 W, was used as the ultrasound source. Potassium ferrate was employed as the oxidizing agent. The effects of various operating parameters, including reaction time, pH, E2 hormone concentration, ferrate concentration, and ultrasound intensity, were evaluated. After the oxidation process, the sample underwent ultraviolet/chlorine radiation to examine the potential formation of chloroform as a disinfection byproduct.
Results: The results indicate that the ferrate-ultrasound system exhibited the highest pollutant removal efficiency, followed by ultrasound and ferrate individually. Specifically, the rates of removal were 0.123 min-1 for the ferrate-ultrasound system, 0.103 min-1 for ultrasound, and 0.0076 min-1 for ferrate. Furthermore, the optimal conditions for E2 hormone removal were found to be pH 3, a ferrate dose of 200 mg/L, an ultrasound frequency intensity of 80 kHz, and an E2 hormone concentration of 100 mg/L, resulting in 100% removal. The study also found that the highest amount of chloroform formed was associated with the ultrasound, ferrate, and ferrate-ultrasound systems, respectively. Additionally, the potential for chloroform formation was higher in ultraviolet/chlorine conditions compared to chlorine alone.
Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate the efficacy of the ultrasound-ferrate method in oxidizing E2 hormones and its potential to mitigate the formation of disinfection byproducts.
Methods: The experiments were conducted using a 250 mL glass container. An ultrasound device operating at frequencies between 24 kHz and 80 kHz, with a maximum power of 200 W, was used as the ultrasound source. Potassium ferrate was employed as the oxidizing agent. The effects of various operating parameters, including reaction time, pH, E2 hormone concentration, ferrate concentration, and ultrasound intensity, were evaluated. After the oxidation process, the sample underwent ultraviolet/chlorine radiation to examine the potential formation of chloroform as a disinfection byproduct.
Results: The results indicate that the ferrate-ultrasound system exhibited the highest pollutant removal efficiency, followed by ultrasound and ferrate individually. Specifically, the rates of removal were 0.123 min-1 for the ferrate-ultrasound system, 0.103 min-1 for ultrasound, and 0.0076 min-1 for ferrate. Furthermore, the optimal conditions for E2 hormone removal were found to be pH 3, a ferrate dose of 200 mg/L, an ultrasound frequency intensity of 80 kHz, and an E2 hormone concentration of 100 mg/L, resulting in 100% removal. The study also found that the highest amount of chloroform formed was associated with the ultrasound, ferrate, and ferrate-ultrasound systems, respectively. Additionally, the potential for chloroform formation was higher in ultraviolet/chlorine conditions compared to chlorine alone.
Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate the efficacy of the ultrasound-ferrate method in oxidizing E2 hormones and its potential to mitigate the formation of disinfection byproducts.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2024/06/8 | Accepted: 2024/06/12 | Published: 2024/07/9
Received: 2024/06/8 | Accepted: 2024/06/12 | Published: 2024/07/9
References
1. Thouennon E, Delfosse V, Bailly R, et al. Insights into the activation mechanism of human estrogen-related receptor γ by environmental endocrine disruptors. Cellular and molecular life sciences 2019;76: 4769-81. [DOI:10.1007/s00018-019-03129-x] [PMID] []
2. De Mes T, Zeeman G, Lettinga G. Occurrence and fate of estrone, 17β-estradiol and 17α-ethynylestradiol in STPs for domestic wastewater. Reviews in environmental science and bio/technology 2005;4: 275-311. [DOI:10.1007/s11157-005-3216-x]
3. Yaping Z, Jiangyong H. Photo-Fenton degradation of 17β-estradiol in presence of α-FeOOHR and H2O2. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2008;78(3-4): 250-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.09.026]
4. An J, Choi K, Yang S, Nam K. Estimation of human-origin estrone and 17β-estradiol concentrations in the Han River, Seoul, South Korea and its uncertainty-based ecological risk characterization. Science of the total environment 2018;633: 1148-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.248] [PMID]
5. Combalbert S, Hernandez-Raquet G. Occurrence, fate, and biodegradation of estrogens in sewage and manure. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2010;86: 1671-92. [DOI:10.1007/s00253-010-2547-x] [PMID]
6. Ribeiro ARL, Moreira NF, Puma GL, Silva AM. Impact of water matrix on the removal of micropollutants by advanced oxidation technologies. Chemical Engineering Journal 2019;363: 155-73. [DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.080]
7. Gao L, Sun L, Wan S, et al. Degradation kinetics and mechanism of emerging contaminants in water by dielectric barrier discharge non-thermal plasma: The case of 17β-Estradiol. Chemical engineering journal 2013;228: 790-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.079]
8. Sharma VK. Potassium ferrate (VI): an environmentally friendly oxidant. Advances in Environmental Research 2002;6(2): 143-56. [DOI:10.1016/S1093-0191(01)00119-8]
9. Sharma VK, Li X, Graham N, Doong R-a. Ferrate (VI) oxidation of endocrine disruptors and antimicrobials in water. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA 2008;57(6): 419-26. [DOI:10.2166/aqua.2008.077]
10. Sharma VK, Mishra SK, Nesnas N. Oxidation of sulfonamide antimicrobials by ferrate (VI)[FeVIO42-]. Environmental Science & Technology 2006;40(23): 7222-7. [DOI:10.1021/es060351z] [PMID]
11. Sharma V. Disinfection performance of Fe (VI) in water and wastewater: a review. Water science and Technology 2007;55(1-2): 225-32. [DOI:10.2166/wst.2007.019] [PMID]
12. Li H, Li S, Srinivasakannan C, et al. Microwave regeneration of spent catalyst coupled with ultrasound augmented copper impregnation as a potential adsorbent photocatalyst. Materials Research Express 2019;6(4): 045608. [DOI:10.1088/2053-1591/aafa09]
13. Zhao T, Li P, Tai C, et al. Efficient decolorization of typical azo dyes using low-frequency ultrasound in presence of carbonate and hydrogen peroxide. Journal of hazardous materials 2018;346: 42-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.12.009] [PMID]
14. Choi AES, Roces S, Dugos N, et al. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted oxidative desulfurization of model sulfur compounds using commercial ferrate (VI). Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 2014;45(6): 2935-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.jtice.2014.08.003]
15. Dong F, Li C, Ma X, et al. Degradation of estriol by chlorination in a pilot-scale water distribution system: Kinetics, pathway and DFT studies. Chemical Engineering Journal 2020;383: 123187. [DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2019.123187]
16. Tak S, Vellanki BP. Applicability of advanced oxidation processes in removing anthropogenically influenced chlorination disinfection byproduct precursors in a developing country. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2019;186: 109768. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109768] [PMID]
17. Gao Y-q, Gao N-y, Chu W-h, et al. UV-activated persulfate oxidation of sulfamethoxypyridazine: Kinetics, degradation pathways and impact on DBP formation during subsequent chlorination. Chemical Engineering Journal 2019;370: 706-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.237]
18. Jyothi K, Yesodharan S, Yesodharan E. Ultrasound (US), Ultraviolet light (UV) and combination (US+ UV) assisted semiconductor catalysed degradation of organic pollutants in water: Oscillation in the concentration of hydrogen peroxide formed in situ. Ultrasonics sonochemistry 2014;21(5): 1787-96. [DOI:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.03.019] [PMID]
19. Bahrami H, Eslami A, Nabizadeh R, et al. Degradation of trichloroethylene by sonophotolytic-activated persulfate processes: Optimization using response surface methodology. Journal of cleaner production 2018;198: 1210-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.100]
20. Han J, Liu Y, Singhal N, et al. Comparative photocatalytic degradation of estrone in water by ZnO and TiO2 under artificial UVA and solar irradiation. Chemical Engineering Journal 2012;213: 150-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.066]
21. Manousaki E, Psillakis E, Kalogerakis N, Mantzavinos D. Degradation of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate in water by ultrasonic irradiation. Water Research 2004;38(17): 3751-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2004.06.002] [PMID]
22. Şahinkaya S. Decolorization of reactive orange 16 via ferrate (VI) oxidation assisted by sonication. Turkish Journal of Chemistry 2017;41(4): 577-86. [DOI:10.3906/kim-1701-8]
23. Wang H, Liu Y, Jiang J-Q. Reaction kinetics and oxidation product formation in the degradation of acetaminophen by ferrate (VI). Chemosphere 2016;155: 583-90. [DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.088] [PMID]
24. Zhang K, Luo Z, Zhang T, et al. Degradation Effect of Sulfa Antibiotics by Potassium Ferrate Combined with Ultrasound (Fe (VI)‐US). BioMed Research International 2015;2015(1): 169215. [DOI:10.1155/2015/169215] [PMID] []
25. He G, Li C, Dong F, et al. Chloramines in a pilot-scale water distribution system: Transformation of 17β-estradiol and formation of disinfection byproducts. Water Research 2016;106: 41-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.047] [PMID]
26. Moradi M, Vasseghian Y, Khataee A, et al. Ultrasound‐assisted synthesis of FeTiO3/GO nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation of phenol under visible light irradiation. Separation and Purification Technology 2021;261: 118274. [DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2020.118274]
27. Arnold WA, Bolotin J, Gunten Uv, Hofstetter TB. Evaluation of functional groups responsible for chloroform formation during water chlorination using compound specific isotope analysis. Environmental science & technology 2008;42(21): 7778-85. [DOI:10.1021/es800399a] [PMID]
28. Deng L, Huang C-H, Wang Y-L. Effects of combined UV and chlorine treatment on the formation of trichloronitromethane from amine precursors. Environmental science & technology 2014;48(5): 2697-705. [DOI:10.1021/es404116n] [PMID]
29. Fiss EM, Rule KL, Vikesland PJ. Formation of chloroform and other chlorinated byproducts by chlorination of triclosan-containing antibacterial products. Environmental science & technology 2007;41(7): 2387-94. [DOI:10.1021/es062227l] [PMID]
30. Gallard H, Von Gunten U. Chlorination of phenols: kinetics and formation of chloroform. Environmental Science & Technology 2002;36(5): 884-90. [DOI:10.1021/es010076a] [PMID]
31. Jin J, El-Din MG, Bolton JR. Assessment of the UV/chlorine process as an advanced oxidation process. Water research 2011;45(4): 1890-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.008] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
