Volume 13, Issue 3 (12-2025)                   J Environ Health Eng 2025, 13(3): 345-356 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Miri M, Pakzad Toochaei S, Khandan Barani H. Assessment of the Abundance and Characteristics of Microplastics in the Effluent of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Plant in Zabol. J Environ Health Eng 2025; 13 (3) :345-356
URL: http://jehe.abzums.ac.ir/article-1-1136-en.html
1- Department of Natural Ecosystems Management, Hamoun International Wetland Institute, Research Institute of Zabol, Zabol, Iran , mirimohadesea@yahoo.com
2- Department of Natural Ecosystems Management, Hamoun International Wetland Institute, Research Institute of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
3- Department of Aquatic Sciences, Hamoun International Wetland Institute, Research Institute of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
Abstract:   (28 Views)
Background: Microplastic pollution has emerged as a significant environmental crisis, posing a serious challenge to human health and ecosystem sustainability, particularly within urban wastewater treatment systems. This study aimed to investigate the abundance, physical characteristics, and chemical composition of microplastics in the effluent of the Zabol urban wastewater treatment plant.
Materials and Methods: Sampling of the treated effluent was conducted in the winter of 2024. Three samples, each with a volume of 10 liters, were collected from the effluent of the wastewater treatment plant. For microplastic separation, the samples were passed through sieves of various mesh sizes, followed by chemical digestion and density-based separation. Microplastics were identified and categorized using optical microscopy and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).
Results: The results indicated that the highest mean abundance was 26.38 ± 1.08 microplastics per liter, with particle sizes ranging from 45 to 425 μm in the treated effluent. The results of the ANOVA test showed that film particles, with a mean abundance of 27.58 ± 1.08 microplastics per liter, accounted for the largest proportion compared to other forms (fibers, fragments, and foams), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). FTIR analysis revealed a considerable diversity of polymers among the detected particles. Among them, polyethylene (PE) showed the highest relative abundance (21.46 ± 0.9), representing the dominant polymer type.
Conclusion: The results of this study provide a clear picture of the status of microplastics in the effluent of this wastewater treatment plant. They also highlight the necessity of continuous monitoring, identification of potential sources, management of lightweight plastic waste, reduction of single-use packaging consumption, and the need for further studies on the pathways and environmental impacts of microplastics in arid and water-scarce regions, especially due to the continuous use of this effluent for irrigation of surrounding agricultural lands.
Full-Text [PDF 2846 kb]   (12 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/09/21 | Accepted: 2025/11/8 | Published: 2025/12/13

References
1. Bhatia SK, Kumar G, Yang Y. Understanding microplastic pollution: Tracing the footprints and eco-friendly solutions. Sci Total Environ. 2024; 169926. [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169926]
2. An L, Liu Q, Deng Y, Wu W, Gao Y, Ling W. Sources of Microplastic in the Environment. 2020; 4:1-41.
3. Silva AB, Bastos AS, Justino CI, da Costa JP, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos TA. Microplastics in the environment: Challenges in analytical chemistry - A review. Anal Chim Acta. 2018; 1017:1-19. [DOI:10.1016/j.aca.2018.02.043]
4. Uddin S, Fowler SW, Behbehani M. An assessment of microplastic inputs into the aquatic environment from wastewater streams. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020; 160:111538. [DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111538]
5. Jessieleena A, Rathinavelu S, Velmaiel KE, et al. Residential houses-a major point source of microplastic pollution: insights on the various sources, their transport, transformation, and toxicity behaviour. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2023; 30:67919-40. [DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-26918-1]
6. Habib RZ, Thiemann T, Al Kendi R. Microplastics and Wastewater Treatment Plants-A Review. J Water Resour Prot. 2020; 12:1-35. [DOI:10.4236/jwarp.2020.121001]
7. Talvitie J, Mikola A, Koistinen A, Setälä O. Solutions to microplastic pollution - Removal of microplastics from wastewater effluent with advanced wastewater treatment technologies. Water Res. 2017; 123:401-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.005]
8. Bodzek M, Pohl A, Rosik-Dulewska C. Microplastics in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Characteristics, Occurrence and Removal Technologies. Water. 2024; 16:3574. [DOI:10.3390/w16243574]
9. Gatidou G, Arvaniti OS, Stasinakis AS. Review on the occurrence and fate of microplastics in sewage treatment plants. J Hazard Mater. 2019; 367:504-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.081]
10. Edo C, González-Pleiter M, Leganés F, Fernández-Piñas F, Rosal R. Fate of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants and their environmental dispersion with effluent and sludge. Environ Pollut. 2019; 259:113837. [DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113837]
11. Weis JS, Alava JJ. (Micro)Plastics Are Toxic Pollutants. Toxics. 2023; 11:935. [DOI:10.3390/toxics11110935]
12. Lehel J, Murphy S. Microplastics in the Food Chain: Food Safety and Environmental Aspects. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2021; 259:1-49. [DOI:10.1007/398_2021_77]
13. Liu W, Liao H, Wei M, Junaid M, Chen G, Wang J. Biological uptake, distribution and toxicity of micro(nano)plastics in the aquatic biota: A special emphasis on size-dependent impacts. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2024; 170:117477. [DOI:10.1016/j.trac.2023.117477]
14. Wang Y, Bai J, Liu Z, Zhang L, Zhang G, Chen G, et al. Consequences of Microplastics on Global Ecosystem Structure and Function. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2023; 261:1-24. [DOI:10.1007/s44169-023-00047-9]
15. Green DS. Biological and ecological impacts of plastic debris in aquatic ecosystems. In: Wagner M, Reemtsma T, editors. Plastics in the Aquatic Environment - Part I. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 111-133. [DOI:10.1007/698_2020_509]
16. Agathokleous E, Iavicoli I, Barceló D, Calabrese EJ. Ecological risks in a 'plastic' world: A threat to biological diversity? J Hazard Mater. 2021; 417:126035. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126035]
17. Badiei A, Karandish F, Tabatabaei SM. The Influence of Irrigation with Raw and Treated Municipal Wastewater on Wheat Yield and Microbial Characteristics of Soil and Plant. J Water Soil Sci. 2017;26(4.2):215-228.
18. Nafea TH, Al-Maliki AJ, Murtadha Al-Tameemi I. Sources, fate, effects, and analysis of microplastic in wastewater treatment plants: A review. Environ Eng Res. 2024;29(1):230040. [DOI:10.4491/eer.2023.040]
19. Al-Amri A, Yavari Z, Reza Nikoo M, Karimi M. Microplastics removal efficiency and risk analysis of wastewater treatment plants in Oman. Chemosphere. 2024; 359:142206. [DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142206]
20. Hidalgo-Ruz V, Gutow L, Thompson RC, Thiel M. Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(6):3060-5. [DOI:10.1021/es2031505]
21. Song YK, Hong SH, Jang M, Han GM, Rani M, Lee J, Shim WJ. A comparison of microscopic and spectroscopic identification methods for analysis of microplastics in environmental samples. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015;93(2):202-9. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.01.015 [DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.01.015]
22. Huang J, Wang L, Liu J, Qian X, Wu Y. Abundance, characteristics, and removal of microplastics in different wastewater treatment plants in a Yangtze River Delta city of China. J Water Process Eng. 2023; 54:103987. [DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103987]
23. Sheriff I, Yusoff MS, Halim HB. Microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: A review of the occurrence, removal, impact on ecosystem, and abatement measures. J Water Process Eng. 2023; 54:104039. [DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104039]
24. Farahmand A, Heidari M, Riyahikhoram M. Performance evaluation of wastewater treatment plant of Qorveh City and survey the possibility usage of effluent for agriculture. Environ Water Eng. 2020;6(1):58-68. doi:10.22034/jewe.2020.223427.1353 [In Persian]
25. Alavian Petroody SS, Hashemi SH. Occurrence and characterization of microplastics in urban wastewater, a case study: Sari Wastewater Treatment Plant. Modares Civ Eng J. 2019;19(6):145-54 [In Persian]
26. Estahbanati S, Fahrenfeld N. Influence of wastewater treatment plant discharges on microplastic concentrations in surface water. Chemosphere. 2016; 162:277-84. [DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.083]
27. Yahyanezhad N, Bardi MJ, Aminirad H. An evaluation of microplastics fate in the wastewater treatment plants: Frequency and removal of microplastics by microfiltration membrane. Water Pract Technol. 2021;(3):782-792 [In Persian] [DOI:10.2166/wpt.2021.036]
28. Farahmand SA, Liu J, Tesoro AG. Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2016; 91:174-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.002]
29. Kim MJ, Na SH, Batool R, Byun IS, Kim EJ. Seasonal variation and spatial distribution of microplastics in tertiary wastewater treatment plant in South Korea. J Hazard Mater. 2022; 438:129474. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129474]
30. Foroutan A, Naderi H, Khalesi M, Dehghan R. Investigation of relationship between residence time distribution and size distribution of solid particles in tank leaching modelling. J Mineral Resour Eng. 2022;7(1):113-28. doi:10.30479/jmre.2021.13751.1427
31. Haque F, Fan C. Fate of microplastics under the influence of climate change. iScience. 2023;26(9):107649. [DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2023.107649]
32. Andrady AL. Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull. 2011;62(8):1596-605. [DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030]
33. Xiang Y, Jiang L, Zhou Y, Luo Z, Zhi D, Yang J, Lam SS. Microplastics and environmental pollutants: Key interaction and toxicology in aquatic and soil environments. J Hazard Mater. 2021; 422:126843. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126843]
34. De Falco F, Di Pace E, Cocca M, Avella M. The contribution of washing processes of synthetic clothes to microplastic pollution. Sci Rep. 2019; 9:6633. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-43023-x]
35. Maw MM, Boontanon SK, Jindal R, Boontanon N, Fujii S. Occurrence and removal of microplastics in activated sludge treatment systems: a case study of a wastewater treatment plant in Thailand. Eng Access. 2022;8(1):106-11
36. Üstün GE, Bozdas K, Can T. Abundance and characteristics of microplastics in an urban wastewater treatment plant in Turkey. Environ Pollut. 2022; 310:119890. [DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119890]
37. Do Van M, Thanh TL, Ngo VD, Thi TD. Distribution and occurrence of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants. Environ Technol Innov. 2022; 26:102286. [DOI:10.1016/j.eti.2022.102286]
38. Hendrickson E, Minor EC, Schreiner KM. Microplastic abundance and composition in Western Lake Superior as determined via microscopy, Pyr-GC/MS, and FTIR. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(4):1787-96. [DOI:10.1021/acs.est.7b05829]
39. Wagner J, Wang Z, Ghosal S, Rochman CM, Gassel M, Wall S. Novel method for the extraction and identification of microplastics in ocean trawl and fish gut matrices. Anal Methods. 2017; 9:1479-90. [DOI:10.1039/C6AY02396G]
40. Biyik Y, Baycan N. Comparison of microplastic detection methods in wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Proc. 2021; 9:29. [DOI:10.3390/environsciproc2021009029]
41. Wahab HA, Gund T. Polymers in the textiles and in the construction industry. Am J Polym Sci Technol. 2024;10(1):15-25. [DOI:10.11648/j.ajpst.20241001.12]
42. Long Z, Li X, Wang Y, et al. Microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: Sources, fate, and pathways. Water Sci Technol. 2019;87(3):685-98.
43. Liu W, Zhang J, Liu H, Guo X, Zhang X, Yao X, Cao Z. A review of the removal of microplastics in global wastewater treatment plants: Characteristics and mechanisms. Environ Int. 2021; 146:106277. [DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2020.106277]
44. Bradney L, Wijesekara H, Palansooriya KN, Obadamudalige N, Bolan NS, Ok YS, et al. Particulate plastics as a vector for toxic trace-element uptake by aquatic and terrestrial organisms and human health risk. Environ Int. 2019; 131:104937. [DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2019.104937]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Environmental Health Engineering

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb